Hi Angliholic Yes, both are used and mean the same thing.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
YankeeHi AngliholicI've never heard 'for', but I'll take your word for it.
Yes, both are used and mean the same thing.
PhilipPersonally, I prefer 'of', but I've heard 'for' used often enough that it seems there are quite a few people who don't share my preference.YankeeHi AngliholicI've never heard 'for', but I'll take your word for it.
Yes, both are used and mean the same thing.
YankeePhilipPersonally, I prefer 'of', but I've heard 'for' used often enough that it seems there are quite a few people who don'YankeeHi AngliholicI've never heard 'for', but I'll take your word for it.
Yes, both are used and mean the same thing.
Google search for 'risk of a heart attack' yields 147,000 hits, 43,000 for 'risk for a heart attack'.
How strange ... here are my results: 'http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=it&q=%22risk+of+a+heart+attack%22&meta=: 300,000 hits; '
Avangi
Me too!
Maybe it's a gringo thing or a doctor thing - "risk factors" "How many of these are you at risk for?" I hear it a lot because I'm at risk for all of 'em. (Doctors are too busy to worry about grammar.) Hi, what do you mean by "a gringa thing?"
- A.
Edit. Sorry, I got that wrong.
AngliholicAvangi
Me too!
Maybe it's a gringo thing or a doctor thing - "risk factors" "How many of these are you at risk for?" I hear it a lot because I'm at risk for all of 'em. (Doctors are too busy to worry about grammar.) Hi, what do you mean by "a gringa thing?"
- A.