Give me some new comment about it., fit it and take a good words better to describe it. Thanks for you help.
The line chart compares the percentage of visitor to England who came to different attractions in Brighton.
Looking at the line chart, it is immediately obvious that four graphaps gradually rose and fell over the given peridod and the the percentage of people came to Pavilion was highest in 2010.
In 1980, the percentage of tourists went to Festival was highest, at 30%. While , the figure for Pier was significantly lower, at 10%. The rate of visitor went to Pavilion was, about 24%, compared to 21% of Art Gallery.
Between 1985 and 1995 have especially rose and fell fluctuation. In 1985, the rate of visitor went to Art Gallery increased about 38% and reduced to 20%. In 1995, Being overtaken of all, the figure for Pavilion rose sharply and reached about 48%. Meanwhile, there were slight period of fluctuation for Festival and Pier.
After 5 year. The percentage of tourists came to Pavilion decreased marginally and became the highest level in entire chart. Ranked the second was the percentage of tourists went to Festival without unchanged in 2010. In addition, the rate of tourists came to Art Gallery was,at 22%. Whereas, the rate of tourists vistied Art Gallery was only under 10%. 
, fit (wrong word) it and take a give me some good words to better to describe it. Thanks for your help. You will learn more if you re-write your essay including the necessary corrections and post it.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Give me some new comments about it., fit (wrong word) it and take a give me some good words to better to describe it. Thanks for your help.
You will learn more if you re-write your