0
Carter Lee Posted 10 years ago
Grammar
Write negative sentence with "have"
Hi.
I wonder that whether we can be using like this or not.
" I can't get in to the house, because of I haven't got a key"
But I want to say like these, But I'm not sure.
1. I can't get into the house, because of I have not a key.
2. I can't get into the house, because of I don't have a key.
3. I can't get into the house, because of I didn't have a key.
I wonder that whether we can be using like this or not.
" I can't get in to the house, because of I haven't got a key"
But I want to say like these, But I'm not sure.
1. I can't get into the house, because of I have not a key.
2. I can't get into the house, because of I don't have a key.
3. I can't get into the house, because of I didn't have a key.
Top answer
Carter Lee I can't get into the house, because I haven't got a key That's fine (as repaired). And this is OK: I can't get into the house, because I don't have a key. The others are not.
- Carter Lee I can't get into the house, because I haven't got a key That's fine (as repaired).
- And this is OK: I can't get into the house, because I don't have a key.
- The others are not.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
10 Answers
0
Carter Lee I can't get into the house, because I haven't got a keyThat's fine (as repaired). And this is OK:
I can't get into the house, because I don't have a key.
The others are not.
00
Mister Micawber Carter Lee I can't get into the house, because I haven't got a keyThat's fine (as repaired). And this is OK:I can't get into the house, because I don't have a key.The others are not.Would you let me know why we can't use the rest of things?
1. I can't get into the house, because I have not a key.
3. I couldn't got into the house,
00
Carter LeeWould you let me know why we can't use the rest of things?Because the grammar is wrong. #1 and #3 should look like #2 (as I fixed it).
00
Mister Micawber Carter LeeWould you let me know why we can't use the rest of things?Because the grammar is wrong. #1 and #3 should look like #2 (as I fixed it).How about this?
1. I can't get into the house, because I have not a key.
3. I couldn't got into the house, because I didn't have a key.
00
No.
1. I can't get into the house, because I don't have a key.
3. I couldn't get into the house, because I didn't have a key.
1. I can't get into the house, because I don't have a key.
3. I couldn't get into the house, because I didn't have a key.
00
1.Mister MicawberNo.1. I can't get into the house, because I don't have a key.3. I couldn't get into the house, because I didn't have a key.THanks I got it.
But I am wondering about when do we can use this form?
" subject + has/have not + objective" without do/did ? (for example, I can't get into the house, because I have not a key, I know
00
Carter LeeBut I am wondering about when do we can use this form?We don't. It is an archaic form.
Carter Lee I have no...+ nounThat is OK.
Carter LeeI have not...+ nounThat is no good.
00
Thanks.
let get back to my original question,
Did you mean that we should use this form "don't have ... + noun" not "have not ... + noun" ?
let get back to my original question,
Did you mean that we should use this form "don't have ... + noun" not "have not ... + noun" ?
00
Carter LeeDid you mean that we should use this form "don't have ... + noun" not "have not ... + noun" ?Right.
00
Mister Micawber Carter LeeDid you mean that we should use this form "don't have ... + noun" not "have not ... + noun" ?Right.I got it thanks very much Mister Micawber:
0
Related Questions