Hello everyone,
I heard these sentences from a native speaker. I know they are not third conditionals.
A: If you did well on your test, then you would’ve studied well for it.
B: Jake would’ve taken the bus to get to school if it rained.
Are these sentences correct? Isn’t “would’ve” in the sentences above a weaker version of “must’ve”? Thank you.
anonymous Are these sentences correct? They are natural, I guess. anonymous Isn’t “would’ve” in the sentences above a weaker version of “must’ve”?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
anonymousAre these sentences correct?
They are natural, I guess.
anonymousIsn’t “would’ve” in the sentences above a weaker version of “must’ve”?
In sentence A, yes. That is unusual in my dialect, and non-standard in general, I think, but everybody knows what it means.
I suppose it is possible that someone cou
anonymousA: If you did well on your test, then you would’ve studied well for it.
~ A: If you did well on your test, then you probably studied well for it.
anonymousB: Jake would’ve taken the bus to get to school if it rained.
~ B: Jake would’ve taken the bus to get to school if it had rained
They cannot be third conditionals because the context is that you did well on your test and it did rain in reality. The native speaker used “would’ve” to speculate whether you studied well for it or whether Jake took the bus. Is that native speaker incorrect in using “would’ve” that way?
anonymousHello everyone,
I heard these sentences from a native speaker. I know they are not third conditionals.
A: If you did well on your test, then you would’ve studied well for it.
B: Jake would’ve taken the bus to get to school if it rained.Are these sentences correct? Isn’t “would’ve” in the sentences above a weaker version of “must’ve”? Th