would/could

Technically yes, but in reality it does not have a strong conditional sense. It is more just a way of offering.

GPYTechnically yes, but in reality it does not have a strong conditional sense. It is more just a way of offering.

GPYTechnically yes, but in reality it does not have a strong conditional sense. It is more just a way of offering.

Can this work?

I will love to split the cost with you if can work something out.

"I would love to (do something)" is the familiar pattern. "I will love to (do something)" is not idiomatic.

"could" is also possible in that sentence. I suppose "could" is more tentative/hypothetical, as usual, but really there is not a great difference in meaning.

GPY"I would love to (do something)" is the familiar pattern. "I will love to (do something)" is not idiomatic."could" is also possible in that sentence. I suppose "could" is more tentative/hypothetical, as usual, but really there is not a great difference in meaning.

But it it's a conditional sentence shouldn't it I stick to the same tense?

Could/woul

KnightofsportsI would love to

This is just a stronger version of the idiom "I would like to", which can be considered grammatically equivalent to a present tense expression. So "would like to" and "would love to" both go with the present tense can.

Any sentence with an if-clause is technically a conditional, but only three such patterns are nu

CalifJimQuote

Ohhh okay! Thank you!!