0
Ljswave Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

Would you show me about "who's to blame"?

I heard and read the sentences below.
The moment I read it , I can't see what the underline means.
because I think it have to be wriitten "who is to be blamed"
so I asked  on the Q/A site of my country.
But I can't get the explanation enough to understand.
Someone says it's a phrase and just memorise.
Would you show me about it?

The sentences go:
-Optimists think about what they want and how to get it.
Pessimists think about what they don't want, their problems
                              and who's to blame.
  

Top answer

)". It's not very obvious even to native speakers how the grammar of it works, so just memorise as a phrase.

  • )".
  • It's not very obvious even to native speakers how the grammar of it works, so just memorise as a phrase.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
"to blame" is a set phrase that means "responsible (for a problem, error, etc.)".

It's not very obvious even to native speakers how the grammar of it works, so just memorise as a phrase.
0
I should add that "to blame" can also be used as a verb infinitive, in the usual way. For example, "It's easy for everyone to blame me" or "I don't know who to blame". This is grammatically different.
0
ljswavewho's to blame
The active infinitive frequently has a passive interpretation in English.

Who is the person to ask? (~ Who should be asked?)
Who is the person to see about this? (~ Who should be seen about this?)
Who is the person to blame? (~ Who should be blamed?)

It's simply an idiomatic turn of phrase to omit "the person"
0
CalifJimIt's simply an idiomatic turn of phrase to omit "the person" in the expression "who is (the person) to blame".
That's definitely historically correct, is it? I wouldn't even be certain that "blame" is a verb and not a noun. Collins Dictionary lists it under the noun sense, at least:

0
GPYThat's definitely historically correct, is it?
Who knows? I'm taking a pedagogical approach, not a historical one. I believe my derivation is reasonably explanatory whether the missing links I postulate can be found in the language historically or not.
GPYI wouldn't even be certain that "blame" is a verb and not a noun.
0
AlpheccaStarsThis dictionary lists "to blame" as an idiom.
Right. That's what we've been saying. Nevertheless, dictionaries don't provide mnemonics for foreign students of English so that they might rationalize and thereby remember idioms as somehow related to standard expressions that are not idioms. I think that's what we can do for students when they ask
0
CalifJimNevertheless, dictionaries don't provide mnemonics for foreign students of English so that they might rationalize and thereby remember idioms as somehow related to standard expressions that are not idioms. I think that's what we can do for students when they ask about such idioms.
I agree. Some idioms are impossible, and others have a somewhat rational

Related Questions