One option is for a router to keep a list of all computers and all the paths to them. The router would then decide how to forward data packets based on this reference table. Packets would be forwarded based on the IP address of the destination computer. This option would become difficult as more users were added to the network. Scalability is introduced when the router keeps a list of all networks, but leaves the local delivery details to the local physical networks. In this situation, the routers pass messages to other routers. Each router shares information about its connected network.1. This option would become difficult as more users were added to the network.(I don't understand this line here. I can't tell if this is a contional statemen or not. Is 'would' here a conditonal or is it is used to make the sentence sound less immediate? Is 'were' past tense, or part of the conditional?)
"were" just helps to indicate a completed action. It wouldn't become difficult until more users ARE added? In that case use "WON'T"
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Wwwdotcom"were" just helps to indicate a completed action. It wouldn't become difficult until more users ARE added? In that case use "WON'T"1. This option would become difficult as more users were added to the network
Wwwdotcom"were" just helps to indicate a completed action. It wouldn't become difficult until more users ARE added? In that case use "WON'T"How come they didn't use 'will' over 'would'?
1. Option A is for a router to keep a list of all computers and all the paths to them.
2. If option A were taken, the router would then decide how to forward data packets based on this reference table and packets would be forwarded based on the IP address of the destination computer.