0
Tinanam0102 Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Would have thrown them off

Hi teachers,

A scene from a TV series. Two scent dogs were following trails to a dead end. They stopped and kept running in circle. Not far from the the dogs stood was a dumpster, where there was a tiny blood inside. But the crew had not noticed it at that time. They came back again some time later to check the dumpster. And this time they found some blood. Then one of them says: If it's her blood, maybe that's why the scent dogs lost their trail. The odor from the dumpster would have thrown them off.

I understand the part "the dog lost their trail", but not the "would have thrown them off". It mean the odor did not throw the dogs off, is it correct? Would you please explain it to me?

Thank you in advance.

Tinanam
  

Top answer

Hi, The 'would ' shows that the speaker is making a deduction, about which he is not completely sure. eg (If my thinking is correct) the odor would have thrown them off. We also see his lack of certainty in his use of the word 'maybe'.

  • Hi, The 'would ' shows that the speaker is making a deduction, about which he is not completely sure.
  • eg (If my thinking is correct) the odor would have thrown them off.
  • We also see his lack of certainty in his use of the word 'maybe'.
  • ' Clive
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
Hi,

The 'would ' shows that the speaker is making a deduction, about which he is not completely sure.

eg (If my thinking is correct) the odor would have thrown them off.

We also see his lack of certainty in his use of the word 'maybe'.
0
Hi Clive,

Thanks for answering my question.

Does that mean "even if the dogs had gone near enough the dumpster where there's little blood inside and because of very little blood, the odor would have thrown them off"? The real fact is the dogs were never near the dumpster.

Thanks

Tinanam
0
Hi,

Does that mean "even if the dogs had gone near enough the dumpster where there's little blood inside and because of very little blood, the odor would have thrown them off"? Yes, that's the idea.

The real fact is the dogs were never near the dumpster. If you say so. But the original text you posted does not te
0
Hi Clive,

I'm sorry I meant to say: "The fact is the dogs were never near enough the dumpster". It was about ten or fifteen steps, which is within sight. The dogs were just chasing their tails.

Would you please correct my sentence in which the tenses I'm not sure if they are correct? Thank you.

tinanam0102A scene from a TV series. Two
0
Hi,

What sentence do you want corrected?

Clive
0
Hi Clive,

The following events I described. Some past tense, some past perfect. Would you correct the sentences below? Thank you.

tinanam0102A scene from a TV series. Two scent dogs were following trails to a dead end. They stopped and kept running in circle. Not far from the the dogs stood was a dumpster, where there was a tiny blood inside. But t
0
Hi,

Oh, you mean 'sentences'.

“A scene from a TV series. Two scent dogs were following trails to a dead end. They stopped and kept running in circle. Not far from the the dogs stood was a dumpster, where there was a tiny blood inside. But the crew had not noticed
0
Hi Clive,

Thanks for correcting my sentences.

Have a great day.

Tinanam

Related Questions