0
Abhioxic Posted 8 years ago
Grammar
Would have or Would had
In 1095 Pope Urban II called for the First Crusade in a sermon at the Council of Clemont. An ethical warfare waged on behalf of some ideal believed to be for the benefit of mankind and to be so beneficial that warfare is justified. I always wondered, had the First Crusade been a disaster, the next to follow, may be, wouldn’t had. [followed]
Is wouldn't had right, or would have been or have might be more appropriate?
Top answer
The correct form is wouldn't have been (conditional III).
- The correct form is wouldn't have been (conditional III).
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
2 Answers
0
0
abhioxicwouldn’t had
That is not a valid verb phrase.
Verbs following modal auxiliaries (may, should, would, might, could, can, will) are in the infinitive form.
0
Related Questions