0
Pructus Posted 7 years ago
Grammar

Would have had to have PP

Hello...


There seem to be some awkward situations to express in subjunctive.

In the below, 1 and 2, in the blank, what will be most suitable?

In the websites, I happen to see expressions like, “would have had to have been”.
I am not sure if those kind of long phrases are being used by native speakers.


1. He is not a doctor and I know it. Then I want to say, if he were a doctor, he would __________ studied hard.


2. The accident did not happen. But some people blame him for the accident. Then he argues as below.

I would ___________ been driving over 300 miles per hour for that to have happened.

  

Top answer

1. He is not a doctor and I know it. He is a lazy person.

  • 1.
  • He is not a doctor and I know it.
  • He is a lazy person.
  • Then I want to say, If he had wanted to be a doctor, he would have had to study hard.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0

1. He is not a doctor and I know it. He is a lazy person.

Then I want to say,

If he had wanted to be a doctor, he would have had to study hard.
0
pructus2. The accident did not happen. But some people blame him for the accident.

This doesn't make sense. If there was no accident, how can anyone blame anyone for it?

CB

0

I think there can be uncertainty about how best to express this idea. You may hear at least three different styles used:

a) I would have to have been driving over 300 miles per hour for that to have happened.

b) I would have had to have been driving over 300 miles per hour for that to have happened.

c) I would have had to be driving over 300 miles per hou

Related Questions