0
Purple Heir Posted 5 years ago
Grammar

Would have

Hello. I really need help with these 'would have' constructions here! Why they are used here and what's the connotation of each one of them if they are different?

Ex 1 'Krum, whom Harry would have thought would have been used to this sort of thing, skulked, half-hidden, at the back of the group.'

  

Top answer

Purple Heir Krum, whom [ who [Harry would have thought] would have been used to this sort of thing], skulked, half-hidden, at the back of the group. If you had asked Harry about it, Harry would have thought this about Krum: Krum would have been used to this sort of thing. / Krum was used to this sort of thing.

  • Purple Heir Krum, whom [ who [Harry would have thought] would have been used to this sort of thing], skulked, half-hidden, at the back of the group.
  • If you had asked Harry about it, Harry would have thought this about Krum: Krum would have been used to this sort of thing.
  • / Krum was used to this sort of thing.
  • The 'would have' in the first clause is from an implicit third-conditional pattern (shown in full above).
  • The 'would have' in the second clause is just the result of a sort of automatic grammatical reflex that tries to match tenses.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
Purple HeirKrum, whom [who [Harry would have thought] would have been used to this sort of thing], skulked, half-hidden, at the back of the group.

If you had asked Harry about it, Harry would have thought this about Krum:
Krum would have been used to this sort of thing. / Krum was used to this sort of thing.

Related Questions