0
Anonymous Posted 8 years ago
Grammar

Would have

The Georgia Supreme Court last month ruled that state prosecutors improperly withheld evidence that would have helped their defense, and the men were entitled to a new trial.


Does 'would have' have an implied if clause? I don't understand what it means. Please help.

  

Top answer

Yes. e. if the evidence had been submitted to the court), it (the evidence) would have helped the case for the defense.

  • Yes.
  • e.
  • if the evidence had been submitted to the court), it (the evidence) would have helped the case for the defense.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0

Yes. It implies:

If that evidence had not been withheld (i.e. if the evidence had been submitted to the court), it (the evidence) would have helped the case for the defense.

0

The Georgia Supreme Court last month ruled that state prosecutors improperly withheld evidence that would have helped their defense, and the men were entitled to a new trial.


If you're asking if there a conditional meaning implied, then I wouldn't say so. The sentence simply expresses the propositions that state senators withheld some evidence and that the men were entitled t

Related Questions