I don't know whether the activity already happened or not when a sentence contains would.
I've found a couple of examples about this would in a textbook that I have, and so I'll quote them to make my point clear.
a) They left the house at 6.00 a.m. and would reach Edinburgh some 12 hours later. (=they reached Edinburgh) and
b) He was sure that the medical tests would show that he was healthy. (= we don't know whether he was healthy or not)
Where is the line between a) and b) ? What makes them different kinds? Why can't we tell if he was health or not, while we can tell they reached Edinburgh?
Thank you.
Top answer
Aha! You do know the answer! a) is a narrative style.
— Avangi
Aha!
You do know the answer!
a) is a narrative style.
The author is understood to be relating a series of events which have already occurred (perhaps fictiously) and the outcome is known.
b) is a statement that someone has expressed a personal opinion.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
a) is a narrative style. The author is understood to be relating a series of events which have already occurred (perhaps fictiously) and the outcome is known.
b) is a statement that someone has expressed a personal opinion. The tests may or may not have even occurred.
This is type (a). He's telling a story, and he knows what the ending is going to be. In this style, "would" is positive. definite.
If he wanted to convey the idea that while they were waiting there, they were uncertain as to whether anyone would show, he'd say, "waiting for blind people who might never show."