No. It's the backshifted form of 'will' for a future in the past.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
fivejedjonNo. It's the backshifted form of 'will' for a future in the past.I couldn't understand you Sir. What do you mean by backshifted? Would you mind explaining with examples please?
fivejedjonIt would have been better if had said 'past-tense form'.If I see someone for the last time, I will never see them again.I saw my father on Christmas day, 1997. I would never see him again. (He died the following day).Whats the difference in context between backshifted would and regular would of past of will? And also does following day mean the same
Anonymous What do you mean by backshifted?Backshifted usually applies to reported speech versus quoted speech.
Anonymous And also does following day mean the same day?I saw my father on Christmas day, 1997. I would never see him again. (He died the following day).
AlpheccaStars Anonymous What do you mean by backshifted?Backshifted usually applies to reported speech versus quoted speech.The verb in the direct quote is shifted back by one tense.John said, "I will meet you in London on New Years Eve."Reported speech:John said that he would meet you in London on New Years Eve."Would" has many uses. Look in a good dictionary to see the
Clive He would kill his friend 'Thomas', . . . Is this would past habitual? Not unless Thomas has nine lives, like a cat.Cats don't have nine lives. ??
AnonymousIs this backshifted 'would'Yes. 'will' changes to 'would' when you backshift the verbs in a sentence, just as the present tense changes to the past tense.ofthe past of 'will'?