Are both sentences past tense? In the first case, can we interpret would to mean 'was going to'? Then it would be past tense, just like the second? Is there a difference between the two?
Thanks,
Top answer
" makes it feel a bit like were "there at the time", asking the question. For example: "He was locked in a cell behind a steel door. e.
— Mr Wordy
" makes it feel a bit like were "there at the time", asking the question.
For example: "He was locked in a cell behind a steel door.
e.
" refers to a past action, but looking back from the perspective of the present, and mindful of the present consequences of the action: "We locked him in a cell.
".
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
In a past tense narrative, "How would he escape?" makes it feel a bit like were "there at the time", asking the question. For example: "He was locked in a cell behind a steel door. How would he escape?" As you say, this is similar to "How was he going to escape?"
"How would he escape?" can also be a timeless hypothetical question (i.e. not set at any specific point in time): "If you lock