0
Usenet Posted 23 years ago
Usage
Wordy opaqueness - the worst English sentence ever published, please
What is the longest and least coherent sentence ever written and published in English?
Length and meaning are separate matters and there's no convenient formula that can connect them. Five words by Martin Amis versus 225 words by Tracy Emin? Who can say which is worst? The decision is visceral - or, in plain speech, worthless.
But what the hell. Hold your nose and dive right in.
Here is my (re)submission:
The ideal of modern architecture being an articulated mechanical adequacy that not only frees human phenomena from robotism of inevitable survival functions; but also, and moreover, tends towards progressive material unselfconsciousness of control, of such adequate mechanics of universal life intercourse, as to bring into high relief the residuary "mental", or "time", awareness of only the eternally ex-static: harmonic, phenomena - thus bespeaking, via the contemporarily, and embryonically, envisioned universal architecture (i.e., radionic-time-growth composition, progressively complementary to, and synchronizable with, a comprehensive life concept, scientifically arrived at, and harmoniously sustained), an eventual elimination of the "time" phenomena (a "past" and "future" based on auto-suggestive procrastinating fallacial concept of the "would-be static entrenchment of the selfish ego") which "time" phenomena blinds the ego to the infinity of the eternal "now", visible only through the universally concerned intellectual optics of integrity.
That sentence was written by Richard Buckminster Fuller, the father of geodesy. It was published in T-Square magazine in February 1932. That was Buckie's big year, the year he finally got moving and made his mark, so there must be something meaningful somewhere in there. But who can spot it?
Not me. It's crap. It means nothing.
Next!
Mickwick,
the universally concerned intellectual optic of integrity
Length and meaning are separate matters and there's no convenient formula that can connect them. Five words by Martin Amis versus 225 words by Tracy Emin? Who can say which is worst? The decision is visceral - or, in plain speech, worthless.
But what the hell. Hold your nose and dive right in.
Here is my (re)submission:
The ideal of modern architecture being an articulated mechanical adequacy that not only frees human phenomena from robotism of inevitable survival functions; but also, and moreover, tends towards progressive material unselfconsciousness of control, of such adequate mechanics of universal life intercourse, as to bring into high relief the residuary "mental", or "time", awareness of only the eternally ex-static: harmonic, phenomena - thus bespeaking, via the contemporarily, and embryonically, envisioned universal architecture (i.e., radionic-time-growth composition, progressively complementary to, and synchronizable with, a comprehensive life concept, scientifically arrived at, and harmoniously sustained), an eventual elimination of the "time" phenomena (a "past" and "future" based on auto-suggestive procrastinating fallacial concept of the "would-be static entrenchment of the selfish ego") which "time" phenomena blinds the ego to the infinity of the eternal "now", visible only through the universally concerned intellectual optics of integrity.
That sentence was written by Richard Buckminster Fuller, the father of geodesy. It was published in T-Square magazine in February 1932. That was Buckie's big year, the year he finally got moving and made his mark, so there must be something meaningful somewhere in there. But who can spot it?
Not me. It's crap. It means nothing.
Next!
Mickwick,
the universally concerned intellectual optic of integrity
Top answer
[nq:1]Here is my (re)submission: The ideal of modern architecture being an articulated mechanical adequacy that not only frees human phenomena ... [/nq] Are you sure about that semi-colon in the third line? PB
- [nq:1]Here is my (re)submission: The ideal of modern architecture being an articulated mechanical adequacy that not only frees human phenomena ...
- [/nq] Are you sure about that semi-colon in the third line?
- PB
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
37 Answers
0
[nq:1]Here is my (re)submission: The ideal of modern architecture being an articulated mechanical adequacy that not only frees human phenomena ... blinds the ego to the infinity of the eternal "now", visible only through the universally concerned intellectual optics of integrity.[/nq]
Are you sure about that semi-colon in the third line?
PB
Are you sure about that semi-colon in the third line?
PB
00
Thus spake Mickwick:
[nq:1]What is the longest and least coherent sentence ever written and published in English? Length and meaning are separate matters ... must be something meaningful somewhere in there. But who can spot it? Not me. It's ****. It means nothing. Next![/nq]
Where's Charles when he's needed? James Joyce has a single sentence chapter in one of his high-modernist books ( Uly
[nq:1]What is the longest and least coherent sentence ever written and published in English? Length and meaning are separate matters ... must be something meaningful somewhere in there. But who can spot it? Not me. It's ****. It means nothing. Next![/nq]
Where's Charles when he's needed? James Joyce has a single sentence chapter in one of his high-modernist books ( Uly
00
[nq:2]The ideal of modern architecture being an articulated mechanical adequacy ... robotism of inevitable survival functions; but also, and moreover, tends[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you sure about that semi-colon in the third line?[/nq]
Yep!
The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the way the Buckie article/manifesto appears in Programmes and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-ce
[nq:1]Are you sure about that semi-colon in the third line?[/nq]
Yep!
The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the way the Buckie article/manifesto appears in Programmes and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-ce
00
[nq:1]Thus spake Mickwick:[/nq]
[nq:2]What is the longest and least coherent sentence ever written and published in English?[/nq]
...
[nq:2]Not me. It's ****. It means nothing. Next![/nq]
[nq:1]Where's Charles when he's needed? James Joyce has a single sentence chapter in one of his high-modernist books ( Ulysses or Finnegans Wake ). It goes on for pages.[/nq]
Molly's soliloquy
[nq:2]What is the longest and least coherent sentence ever written and published in English?[/nq]
...
[nq:2]Not me. It's ****. It means nothing. Next![/nq]
[nq:1]Where's Charles when he's needed? James Joyce has a single sentence chapter in one of his high-modernist books ( Ulysses or Finnegans Wake ). It goes on for pages.[/nq]
Molly's soliloquy
00
Mickwick defended his transcription:
[nq:1]The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the way the Buckie article/manifesto appears in Programmes and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-century architecture by Ulrich Conrads.[/nq]
That may be, but how does Conrads's transcription relate to what Fuller actually wrote? For an American of the 1930s to put commas to the right of clo
[nq:1]The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the way the Buckie article/manifesto appears in Programmes and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-century architecture by Ulrich Conrads.[/nq]
That may be, but how does Conrads's transcription relate to what Fuller actually wrote? For an American of the 1930s to put commas to the right of clo
00
[nq:2]Are you sure about that semi-colon in the third line?[/nq]
[nq:1]Yep! The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the way the Buckie article/manifesto appears in Programmes and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-century architecture by Ulrich Conrads.[/nq]
Then I conclude that it is not a sentence, and ineligible for the prize.
Next!
PB
[nq:1]Yep! The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the way the Buckie article/manifesto appears in Programmes and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-century architecture by Ulrich Conrads.[/nq]
Then I conclude that it is not a sentence, and ineligible for the prize.
Next!
PB
00
[nq:2]The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the ... and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-century architecture by Ulrich Conrads.[/nq]
[nq:1]Then I conclude that it is not a sentence, and ineligible for the prize. Next![/nq]
Er .. Er ...
Oh, ****** it, you know what I mean. The longest bit of *** ever contained to the left of a single full-stop.
How's that? Not a
[nq:1]Then I conclude that it is not a sentence, and ineligible for the prize. Next![/nq]
Er .. Er ...
Oh, ****** it, you know what I mean. The longest bit of *** ever contained to the left of a single full-stop.
How's that? Not a
00
[nq:1]Mickwick defended his transcription:[/nq]
[nq:2]The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the ... and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-century architecture by Ulrich Conrads.[/nq]
[nq:1]That may be, but how does Conrads's transcription relate to what Fuller actually wrote? For an American of the 1930s to put commas to the right of closing quotes would have been strang
[nq:2]The whole thing is a completely accurate transcription of the ... and manifestoes (sic) on 20th-century architecture by Ulrich Conrads.[/nq]
[nq:1]That may be, but how does Conrads's transcription relate to what Fuller actually wrote? For an American of the 1930s to put commas to the right of closing quotes would have been strang
00
(snip)
[nq:1]Here is my (re)submission:[/nq]
(appallingly loathesome sentence snipped)
[nq:1]That sentence was written by Richard Buckminster Fuller, the father of geodesy.[/nq]
Fuller was the father of the geodesic dome, but geodesy dates to the sixteenth century, a bit before his time.
[nq:1]It was published in T-Square magazine in February 1932. That was Buckie's big year, t
[nq:1]Here is my (re)submission:[/nq]
(appallingly loathesome sentence snipped)
[nq:1]That sentence was written by Richard Buckminster Fuller, the father of geodesy.[/nq]
Fuller was the father of the geodesic dome, but geodesy dates to the sixteenth century, a bit before his time.
[nq:1]It was published in T-Square magazine in February 1932. That was Buckie's big year, t
00
[nq:1]Where's Charles when he's needed? James Joyce has a single sentence chapter in one of his high-modernist books ( Ulysses or Finnegans Wake ). It goes on for pages.[/nq]
After a lot of deliberation and more drink than is good for me, the commission has finally come up with this:
Rule 3: Authors who write in a deliberately meaningless fashion are excluded.
But please let this be th
After a lot of deliberation and more drink than is good for me, the commission has finally come up with this:
Rule 3: Authors who write in a deliberately meaningless fashion are excluded.
But please let this be th
0
Related Questions