Words synthesis,

Please I need someone to correct it because my teacher penalizes grammar faults.

As a well known American writer, Philipp K , has said: "The basic tool for manipulation of reality is the manipulating of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control people".
The three documents under study deal with the using of words, describing that process in different way; while Benjamin Zephania a poet and Noam Chomski a journalist wrote in 2001 about the manipulation of words in a political aspect whereas Rose Prince another journalist, explained how food factories use words for their products.
In what extent words are powerful tools to manipulate people.
The first point is a question between words and their meaning, then is to explain the aim of that process and at last to highlight the possible danger.
These documents demostrate that words are often removed from their meaning. In too back, too strong, many polyptatons are used, such as "government", "govern", to illustrqte the differencies between the signifier and the signifiant. Noam Chomski, as for him explains the importance of the name to call the "war". In fact, the American government stop using the word "war" to make a reference to their political actions abroad, as in Iraq for instance, after the attack at the World Trade Center in 2001. Moreover, in her article, Rose Price condems the industrialists to play on the meaning of words to evocate something harmless. The latters explain through different way how wordss are stemed from their meaning but they also explain why.
Obviously, it is hard to observe that words are not transparent. For a long time, words are used for different actions, political figures are more likely to play with words. The three documents highlight that fact. Indeed, words areused in such a way that people are not preoccupied with their social condition, war or their health. Moreover, manipulating words is a springboard for their users. Noam Chomski developpes the idea that the American government tries to protect the country to not lead to a terrorism state. And Rose Prince emphasizes on the absurdity of the economical arguments of the food manufacturers : oil is cheaper than butter but because it is "vegetable" it is harmless.
These authors want their readers to react and warn them to be careful about words. To separate words from their meaning can b blinding for those who listening. Besides, Benjamin Zephaniah makes people think and reat qnd he pushes them to prostest thier discontents against the state's control or money. People have to make allowances and above all to not take words to what they are. Rose Prince talks about the danger created by the food manufacturers.
These texts excoriate the meaning of words on a political point of view and an economical : words are taken apart from their meaning to deceive people. Futhermore, the authors emphasize the fact that a danger is potentially present.