0
Ssendur Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

word order

hi i have a word order problem.

for example in this sentence : "C++ variables have a property in addition to their value and type known as scope." , if this was my sentence i would say it in this order : "C++ variables have a property known as scope in addition to their value and type." or i would say like this : " C++ variables in addition to their value and type, have a property known as scope." . The first sentence is the original one from the book, but isnt there an ambigious expression "type known as scope" ; is the type known as scope or variables have another property which is known as scope? how can a native english speaker differenciate between the two. please help me on that, i have been a word encapsulation problem since i staterted to learn english.

Thank you in advance.
  

Top answer

Hello ssendur-- and welcome to English Forums. Context prevents the original from being misunderstood, and that is a frequent task for context: without it, many utterances are ambiguous. Yours are OK, too, but one needs punctuation repairs.

  • Hello ssendur-- and welcome to English Forums.
  • Context prevents the original from being misunderstood, and that is a frequent task for context: without it, many utterances are ambiguous.
  • Yours are OK, too, but one needs punctuation repairs.
  • " .
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
.
Hello ssendur-- and welcome to English Forums.

Context prevents the original from being misunderstood, and that is a frequent task for context: without it, many utterances are ambiguous.

Yours are OK, too, but one needs punctuation repairs. These are all good in context:

"C++ variables have a property in addition to their value and type known as scope."
0
ssendur"C++ variables have a property in addition to their value and type known as scope."
Welcome to the forums, ssendur.

I agree with Mister Micawber's comments. This kind of construction troubles me too. I see it far too often in books and other writings that presumably have had the benefit of professional editing. In this case the potential for co
0
thank you so much guys

Related Questions