0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Word inclusion

Does the inclusion of 'from' alter the meaning of the sentence or not really?

He suffered 'from' an injury to the head.

Thanks.
  

Top answer

Think of it this way. eg At 7am, he suffered an injury. to his head.

  • Think of it this way.
  • eg At 7am, he suffered an injury.
  • to his head.
  • For the next 10 days, he suffered from the injury to his head.
  • Clive
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

13 Answers
0
Think of it this way.
eg
At 7am, he suffered an injury. to his head.
For the next 10 days, he suffered from the injury to his head.

Clive
0
1. He suffered from an injury to the head.
2. He suffered an injury to the head.

The meanings are very similar.

1. He experienced pain because he had had an injury to his head.
2. He experienced an injury to his head.

I'd say that 1 focuses on the fact that he was in pain because of the injury, and 2 focuses on the fact that an accident happened which resulted
0
CliveThink of it this way.eg At 7am, he suffered an injury. to his head.For the next 10 days, he suffered from the injury to his head.Clive
Thanks a lot, Clive. That was helpful. I would like you yo confirm that I have understood correctly. The first on implies that an incident or an event happened, and not the fact of being in pain; the second implies that th
0
CalifJim1. He suffered from an injury to the head.2. He suffered an injury to the head.The meanings are very similar.1. He experienced pain because he had had an injury to his head.2. He experienced an injury to his head.I'd say that 1 focuses on the fact that he was in pain because of the injury, and 2 focuses on the fact that an accident happened which resulted in the i
0
Thanks a lot, Clive. That was helpful. I would like you yo confirm that I have understood correctly.Yes, you have.
0
AnonymousI just wanted to know whether the first focuses on that fact that he was in pain, and the second that an event or accident happened and not the state of being in pain. Have I understood correctly, as I have been looking for the correct difference for a while?
Correct.
Anonymousdo you agree that the following sentence also focus
0
CalifJim AnonymousI just wanted to know whether the first focuses on that fact that he was in pain, and the second that an event or accident happened and not the state of being in pain. Have I understood correctly, as I have been looking for the correct difference for a while?Correct.Anonymousdo you agree that the following sentence also focuses on the occurrence of the e
0
AnonymousSo when the word 'suffer' is used when the thing experienced involves suffering it means that the experience involved the feeling of pain, in other words, right?
Yes, but the pain can be metaphoric: The company suffered a setback in its project to import oil.
AnonymousAlso, ..., I asked about alter the meaning to the other one
0
CalifJim AnonymousSo when the word 'suffer' is used when the thing experienced involves suffering it means that the experience involved the feeling of pain, in other words, right?Yes, but the pain can be metaphoric: The company suffered a setback in its project to import oil.AnonymousAlso, ..., I asked about alter the meaning to the other one (focusing on that fact that h
0
AnonymousI meant does the same explanation and meaning apply to this sentence with and without 'from'"he suffered (from) a stab to the head.
Oh. OK. Now I understand your question.

Yes, the explanation is the same for all sentences like that.

CJ

Related Questions