0
SarahKing Posted 6 years ago
Grammar

Won't be writing

This dialogue is from a series called Dracula.

The context is this: Dracula is pretending to be a rich industrialist called Alexander Greyson. He throws a lavish party to show off his wealth and power. The party also provides an opportunity to give a demonstration of his revolutionary scientific invention which could make possible investors interested.

The dialogue is between Dracula’s butler and confidant and Jonathan Harker, a journalist.

-The invitation forbade the press (says the butler)

-I’m here on a social basis (says Harker)

-what a shame. Mr greyson will be disappointed that you won’t be writing at least a word or two.

Now, why the butler used the future continuous and not the future simple? Would it have a different meaning? Are they interchangeable? If so, why use one over the other?

  

Top answer

SarahKing Now, why did the butler use the future continuous and not the future simple? If focuses on a future action that will occur over a period of time. The act of "writing at least a word or two" covers taking notes, thinking about what you want to say, writing it, editing it, and then posting the article in the reporter's newspaper.

  • SarahKing Now, why did the butler use the future continuous and not the future simple?
  • If focuses on a future action that will occur over a period of time.
  • The act of "writing at least a word or two" covers taking notes, thinking about what you want to say, writing it, editing it, and then posting the article in the reporter's newspaper.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
SarahKingNow, why did the butler use the future continuous and not the future simple?

If focuses on a future action that will occur over a period of time.

The act of "writing at least a word or two" covers taking notes, thinking about what you want to say, writing it, editing it,

Related Questions