Hello I got interested in your question and tried to find their difference by reading dictionaries. But as far as I got, there seems no difference between them. OED gives to 'without X' an definition 'with the absence of X' and Webster 'with no X'.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
At every restaurant, they just stared at me and later I had to explain them. I didn't want to confuse them. But I was just curious as to how people understand and answer for "without". My study shows none understands. Maybe they are accustomed to using "with no". Am I right?
Please answer me in this regard...