0
Kooyeen Posted 19 years ago
Speech & Pronunciation

without a fight / without to fight

Hi,
what's the difference in prounciation between "without a fight" and "without to fight"? I think there's a difference in AmE, because the first has a tapped T, the second doesn't. And... what about BrE? Can they be the same? Thanks Emotion: smile
  

Top answer

The problem is that I can see no correct use for the second phrase-- how would I put it into a sentence?

  • The problem is that I can see no correct use for the second phrase-- how would I put it into a sentence?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
The problem is that I can see no correct use for the second phrase-- how would I put it into a sentence?
0
Ooops, I should have written:
Start to fight.
Start a fight.

Emotion: smile
0
In AmE, 'start to fight' has the tapped-t and 'start a fight' has a flap-t (/d/) for most speakers.
0
start to fight star.tt'o figh.t
start a fight starta figh.t

where t is unaspirated, t' is aspirated, .t is unreleased, and t is a t like a d (tapped).

AmE

CJ
0
Oops!-- I should at least get my terminology right. 'Tapped-t' = 'flap-t' = /d/ ? (I was calling an unreleased t a 'tapped-t').
0
The t that's like a d is usually called a tapped t, but some authors call it flapped.
I see the word flapped more frequently in reference to the Spanish or Italian flapped r.

You're right that the unreleased t is something different. I think there's another term for that as well, but it's slipped my mind just now -- stopped t, maybe?

CJ
0
Thank you,
I knew it had to be that way, but I was wondering what would happen if a Brit said that...

I think the difference would be:
- start to fight <--- stopped t followed by an aspirated t
- start a fight <---- unaspirated t

...provided the speaker doesn't pronounce intervocalic t's as glottal stops.

Related Questions