With + participle Question
I already know that "with + noun + participle" is correct. But I wonder that if the subject and the noun are the same, I can use "with + noun + participle" phrase without "noun". I understand there would be other ways to express something I'm trying to express. But I really want to know if it is possible. For example, the sentence that the horse was running without enough rest with being afraid of his trainer could make sense?
Top answer
HaonHaon the sentence that the horse was running without enough rest with being afraid of his trainer could make sense? No, that does not make sense. HaonHaon I wonder that if the subject and the noun are the same, I can use "with + noun + participle" phrase without "noun".
- HaonHaon the sentence that the horse was running without enough rest with being afraid of his trainer could make sense?
- No, that does not make sense.
- HaonHaon I wonder that if the subject and the noun are the same, I can use "with + noun + participle" phrase without "noun".
- I don't see that in your example.
- Perhaps you could compose a simpler one?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
HaonHaonthe sentence that the horse was running without enough rest with being afraid of his trainer could make sense?
No, that does not make sense.
HaonHaon I wonder that if the subject and the noun are the same, I can use "with + noun + participle" phrase without "noun".
I don't see that in your example. Perhaps
0
Related Questions