Although the grammars are correct, only #1 seems to me to be a natural utterance. You'll hear 'was' in #1 before you hear #2 or #3, I'm sure.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Mister MicawberAlthough the grammars are correct, only #1 seems to me to be a natural utterance. You'll hear 'was' in #1 before you hear #2 or #3, I'm sure.Can #2 be used in the sentence as a wish for the future?
Mister MicawberAs I said, #2 and #3 are of questionable use in any circumstance, but I agree with your comment on #2. 'Could' means possibility, and all things have the possibility of change, though for some it may be low.Regarding 'could', why possibility and not ability? How can one tell?