".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
KhoshtipMan I'd say, "who else would it be?".Thanks a lot. That was what I thought.
KhoshtipManReading your two sentences, I get that only "could" is proper. Someone introduces another person to their brother at the present time. There is no sense on having a subject (to talk) about in the future, there.I actually don't get what you are trying to convey. Do you mean that there is no sense on having a subject about in the future by using 'wi
Anonymous there is no sense on having a subject to talk about in the futureI meant this. Sorry for incorrect use of parentheses.
KhoshtipMan Anonymous there is no sense on having a subject to talk about in the futureI meant this. Sorry for incorrect use of parentheses.I see. And would this be due to the use of 'will' only or 'would' also?
AnonymousAnd would this be due to the use of 'will' only or 'would' also?I don't understand this. If you are asking "why is not would correct?", to me, would does not match the sentences.
KhoshtipManto me, would does not match the sentences"Would" is fine, especially if the reply carries a sarcastic undertone.