0
Anonymous Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Why water level and not water's level?

It may sound naive, but I am trying to figure out this issue for so long. Apostrophe is omitted because water is an inanimate object? Or because level is a property and cannot be owed? Why?

Please help.
  

Top answer

Good one. I think the two words of "water level" make a term, therefore the lack of apostrophe. " - The water level of the pool is quite low today.

  • Good one.
  • I think the two words of "water level" make a term, therefore the lack of apostrophe.
  • " - The water level of the pool is quite low today.
  • - The water's level in the pool is quite low today.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Good one. I think the two words of "water level" make a term, therefore the lack of apostrophe. However, one can always point to a beaker of water or a swimming pool and say "the water's level in the pool or beaker is...."

- The water level of the pool is quite low today.
- The water's level in the pool is quite low today.
0
Thanks for the answer.

Not fully understood because I still cannot generalize to other two words terms. I guess I have to read a more. If I only knew the name of this kind of rules.

Best Regards,
0
AnonymousI still cannot generalize to other two words terms.
I had a thread the other day in which the poster wanted to put everything in the possessive, but using "The X of the Y." (The key of the house. The house's key) In this case, we'd say, "the house key." I guess this is similar to "water level."
The problem is that you can't always generalize.
0
I am tempted to believe that those cases do not have possessive because the subjects are inanimate objects.

I guess that my best option for now is to check each confusing term in google and see what the majority does.

Thanks for the answers guys.

Related Questions