0
Anonymous Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

Why use passive tense on scatter when talking about cells?

I saw a newspaper having a sentence below:
My cells were scattered all over the place. I had no choice.

Why use passive tense? In my opinion, I think cells are alive. They can move by themselves.

Thank you
  

Top answer

Hi The reference here is to cancerous cells and the question is whether they have only appeared in one place or are in many places This is not a matter of whether the individual cells have - actively - scattered. They are not moving. It's a question of where they are found: are they found to be localised (in one small place) or are they found to be scattered (all over the place).

  • Hi The reference here is to cancerous cells and the question is whether they have only appeared in one place or are in many places This is not a matter of whether the individual cells have - actively - scattered.
  • They are not moving.
  • It's a question of where they are found: are they found to be localised (in one small place) or are they found to be scattered (all over the place).
  • So the passive is correct Dave
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
Hi

The reference here is to cancerous cells and the question is whether they have only appeared in one place or are in many places

This is not a matter of whether the individual cells have - actively - scattered. They are not moving. It's a question of where they are found: are they found to be localised (in one small place) or are they found to be scattered (all over the place

Related Questions