0
Believer Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

Why this way?

Hi,

I think I have asked some questions along this line in the past but since the understanding of the matter has eluded me still, I wish to ask this question. Please take a look at my alternate versions and tell me why my versions are less preferable to those that are not mine.

When choosing a computer, consider these three factors: speed, memory and cost. -- For this sentence, only thing that causes me trouble is the word 'cost'. I looked up the word in a dictionary and there, it seems to give several definitions with none indicating it as an uncountable or variable noun. I think it is used based on what it represents, not what is shown in a dictionary. I think some words can be used in this way but certainly not all words in the English language. Are there some guiding points on this?

My version (with just one modification/change): When choosing a computer, consider these three factors: speed, memory and costs.

More critical to the learning environment than approach, method, or content are ... -- Here, the two words 'approach' and 'method' are troubling to me. Why not?

My version: More critical to the learning environment than approaches, methods, or content are ...

Is there any guideline to this usage of a certain word for its functional meaning based on what it represents to our perception of meaning? (I don't know if I stated what I feel correctly.)
  

Top answer

Hi Believer, I share your dilemma, if not your knowledge of the terminology. " Obviously the three nouns you've selected can function both ways. What's needed are guidelines which abstract the difference and give it some structure.

  • Hi Believer, I share your dilemma, if not your knowledge of the terminology.
  • " Obviously the three nouns you've selected can function both ways.
  • What's needed are guidelines which abstract the difference and give it some structure.
  • To my ear, both your examples sound okay with singulars or with plurals.
  • What sounds objectionable is mixing them.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

15 Answers
0
Hi Believer,

I share your dilemma, if not your knowledge of the terminology. I'd call the difference "stuff" vs "things." Obviously the three nouns you've selected can function both ways. What's needed are guidelines which abstract the difference and give it some structure.

To my ear, both your examples sound okay with singulars or with plurals. What sounds objectionable is mi
0
cost here = price. A computer only has one price.
0
Nona The Britcost here = price. A computer only has one price.
Hi,

There could be compatibility issues with existing peripherals and software that could entail additional expenditure - training issues, support issues, reliability, warantee, etc.

Regards, - A.
0
Hi, Avangi. Thank you.

When you say that you object to mixing them, what exactly do you mean?

Would you be more specific? Would you resent my mixing of singular and plural form of the words here? I think you would.

More critical to the learning environment than 1) approaches, 2) methods, or 3) content are ...

But I seem to see many instances where this kind of
0
Hi Believer,

I want to help you sort this out if I can. Right now the old brain is out of focus and I need some sleep. I can't help thinking that somebody has a name for this issue and has carefully laid it all out. In my present condition, if you were to give me a list of nouns, I could say, "Yes, that's one of them," or "No, that's a different thing altogether." That's about it. (I d
0


Hi, Believer,

I'm still at the point where I have to take these nouns on a case-by-case basis. Let's talk about one of my favorite subjects, food (or foods.)

Category one (I'm making this up): nuts, cherries, berries, peas, beans, etc. (small things) -

You can make a pecan pie or a cherry pie (adjective). You can talk about a single pea, but who would?
0
Thank you, Avangi.

So I think what you seem to alluding to me is that native speakers like you (I am sure you are one of them) seem to divide a noun into categories based on practical usage -- the usage that serves a practical purpose in an environment where English is spoken naturally -- although some people would make up a different number of categories than yours and not necessarily in
0
My guess is that the distinguishing terms like a countable noun, an uncountable noun, a mass noun, and others are set up/created for the purpose of serving the needs of English learners in a non-English speaking environment.
Exactly. Native speakers never give a millisecond's thought to whether a noun is countable or not. (A fish never wonders how it could possib
0
When choosing a computer, consider these three factors: speed, memory and cost.

... consider these three factors: the speed factor, the memory factor, and the cost factor.

Each of the three is a noun used as an adjective. Nouns used as adjectives, that is, used to form compound nouns, are almost always in the singular. The final version is simply an
0
Thanks, Believer.

In practice, I'm sure it's "patterns" rather than "categories." When you learn by listening, you copy the pattern, and somebody says, "No, that one doesn't work that way. It goes like this:" Then you learn another pattern.

Many people say they never really understood the mechanics of their own language until they studied a second language. I guess the method

Related Questions