0
Blackcheetah Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

why is "with" used here rather than "of" or "from"

0 I visited this website by chance and loved it soon because of its quick answer to the questions of those English learner like me. I also appreciate these moderators like "Grammer Seeker" and "Cliver" because of their quick respond and warm heart.02br
02br
00Now I have new questions:02br
02br
001. For now the dance routines continue and have attracted new fans like Ray Mahoney, an American volunteer 01font01i00with02i02font00 a local AIDS-prevention organization. Mahoney, 50, has been visiting Lai Lai with fellow volunteers to hand out free condoms and safe-sex literature.02br
02br
00why is "with" (labelled by red ) used here rather than "of" or "from"? what is the difference in the meaning if "of" or "from"is used?0-
  

Top answer

0Hi blackcheetah,02br 02br 00Both "with" and "from" work in your example. I prefer "with" because it has a greater sense of involvement. The volunteer is a real participant in the organization.

  • 0Hi blackcheetah,02br 02br 00Both "with" and "from" work in your example.
  • I prefer "with" because it has a greater sense of involvement.
  • The volunteer is a real participant in the organization.
  • "02br 02br 00Compare it to a sports team.
  • He's a pitcher 01u 00with02u 00 the Boston Red Sox.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
0Hi blackcheetah,02br
02br
00Both "with" and "from" work in your example. I prefer "with" because it has a greater sense of involvement. The volunteer is a real participant in the organization. "From" the organization seems to suggest he's been extracted, or borrowed from the organization, as in "Where are you from?"02br
02br
00I think "of" would only b
0
1b00how do you do, Avangi02b02br
02br
01b00Thanks for your explanation with so much details. I am very happy to get this when I woke up. however ,you are so humourous and not cold at all. I am also glad that I could communicate with a native speaker by learning English.02b0-
0
0Hi Avangi,02br
00I am thinking if there is one more reason for the choice of "with". A volunteer does not actually belong to the organization. A volunteer can work with more than one organizations for different volunteer works. For example, Mary is "with" the local AIDS-prevention organization and also the Red Cross. I interpret "from" as saying she belongs to the organization f
0
0Hi Pter, Your point is well taken. A person may say, "I'm with the Blue Dragons," knowing he's not a full-fleged member. And on the receiving end, the listener may or may not assume he's not a member. I don't think there's enough tradition with that usage among native speakers to say for sure, one way or the other. Without corroborating context, I believe the majority would assume he's an
0
0Thank you very much, Avangi, for your detailed explanation! 05000[Y]02br
00"Volunteer fire department"? That sounds so nostalgic to me. It was before I was born that we had volunteer fire fighters in my city.010id1

Related Questions