0
Anonymous Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Why "for"?

Newby travelseverywhere with a cellular phone and call-out roster for otherteam members; at home, a special beeper sits on his nightstand.

An article from Time about NEST.

Why the author used "for"? Isn't "of" more suitable?
  

Top answer

No, 'for' is fine. Many learners grasp at 'of' as a default preposition, but native speakers often have other preferences. A roster for members = a roster for the purpose of contacting/identifiying/enumerating/ etc members.

  • No, 'for' is fine.
  • Many learners grasp at 'of' as a default preposition, but native speakers often have other preferences.
  • A roster for members = a roster for the purpose of contacting/identifiying/enumerating/ etc members.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
No, 'for' is fine. Many learners grasp at 'of' as a default preposition, but native speakers often have other preferences. A roster for members = a roster for the purpose of contacting/identifiying/enumerating/ etc members.
0
Thank you Mister Micawber!

But I check the corpus (JustTheWord), and the examples are:

I managed to get a leave roster for you all
A roster for crusts had to be started as these contained more bread than the average thin slice.  Hundreds 
0
Could it be the "cellular phone and call-out roster" so that the author chose to use "for"?

Related Questions