Look at the sentence:
—> That’s the actor who was a pilot in Star Wars.
The relative pronoun is the subject so we cannot omit it.
I know that we can omit the relative pronoun if it’s the object.
My question is :
Why can the relative pronoun (+ be verb) be omitted from these following sentences ?
1)
—> My brother, who is a former professional hokey player, coaches elite high school hockey.
becomes:
—> My brother, a former professional hokey player, coaches elite high school hockey.
2)
—> Teachers who work online have flexible schedules.
becomes:
—> Teachers working online have flexible schedules.
com/questions/537963/why-can-the-relative-pronoun-be-omitted/537966#537966
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I answered your questions here: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/537963/why-can-the-relative-pronoun-be-omitted/537966#537966
miradorMy brother, a former professional hockey player, coaches elite high school hockey.
You can put two noun phrases in sequence like that when they both refer to the same person or thing. It may look like the omission of components of a relative clause, but it's considered a different construction (an 'appositi