0 Hi there, I hope you can explain/tell the rule as to why these are wrong please: 02br 02br 00If I will be rich, I would retire.01i00 should be02i02br 00If I were rich, I would retire.02br 02br 00-the reasoning I came up with is can't use future tense (will be) here. Past tense can refer to future time. 02br 02br 00She described me the picture. 01i00should be 02i02br 00She described the picture to me.02br 02br 00-I want to say the direct object goes before the indirect object, but that is not complete... 02br 02br 00She met John and I in Montreal. 01i00should be 02i02br 00She met John and me in Montreal. 02br 02br 00-an explination I found is if you take John out of the sentence, it would still read right (She met me in Montreal), but not if you take I out of the sentence.0-
Top answer
01. If I were rich, I would retire. This is the use of the 'subjunctive' tense - to discuss a hypothetical situation.
— Nona the brit
01.
If I were rich, I would retire.
This is the use of the 'subjunctive' tense - to discuss a hypothetical situation.
I am not rich.
I would retire if I were rich.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
01. If I were rich, I would retire. This is the use of the 'subjunctive' tense - to discuss a hypothetical situation. I am not rich. I would retire if I were rich. Search this site for 'subjunctive' for lots of relevant threads.02br 02br 002. Tricky. There are other verbs where the first would be acceptable. 02br 02br 003. Yes. That is a simple way to wor
0 01i00If I will be rich02i00 - You can't have 01i00will02i00 or 01i00would02i00 in the 01i00if02i00 clause of a conditional structure.02br 02br 01i00describe me the picture02i00 - 01i00describe02i00 (and other verbs) do not allow this word o