0
Believer Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

Why a here but not there?

Hi,

Take a look at the following and please tell me why a person would not put the article in the first but put one in the second.

1. He was inspired with tremendous courage.

2. He was a new courage.

Would you say if the sentence 1 has a prior context where the concept of 'courage' was discussed and if this is pointing to one kind of courage, then it could have a there without any modifying or restrictive phrase or clause following it?

Like this:

He was inspired with with a tremendous courage.
  

Top answer

Yes, but I don't particularly like an article in either sentence. The uncountable form works better.

  • Yes, but I don't particularly like an article in either sentence.
  • The uncountable form works better.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Yes, but I don't particularly like an article in either sentence. The uncountable form works better.
0
Thank you, Mr. M.

Sentence 2 was written correctly. It should have been "He was inspired with a new courage."

Can you then accept both ot the following as correct?

He was inspired with a new courage.

He was inspired with new courage.

Doesn't the existence of the adjective 'new' make it necessary for it to have a like the 1st sentenc
0
Doesn't the existence of the adjective 'new' make it necessary for it to have a like the 1st sentence?
Absolutely not! An adjective never makes an uncountable noun countable of necessity. Both sentences here are better without the article.
0
You can also say:

2. He has new courage.

Related Questions