0
Usenet Posted 16 years ago
Usage

Who/whom

Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much who they liked.
or
Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.

.. A lamprophyre containing small phenocrysts of olivine and augite, and usually also biotite or an amphibole, in a glassy groundmass containing analcime.
  

Top answer

[nq:1]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much who they liked. [/nq] Whom.

  • [nq:1]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much who they liked.
  • [/nq] Whom.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
[nq:1]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much who they liked. or Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.[/nq]
Whom.
0
[nq:2]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty ... and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.[/nq]
[nq:1]Whom.[/nq]
Thank you. I thought it might be the second one.

.. A lamprophyre containing small phenocrysts of olivine and augite, and usually also biotite or an amphibole, in a glassy groundmass containing analcime.
0
[nq:1]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.[/nq]
The objective case is correct, but "whom" sets a pretty high register nowadays. It's a little jarring after those two highly informal phrases right before it. Also, I'd use "who(m)ever" in this context.

"It's not the size of the boat, it's Matt McIrvin" Joe ¬R /
0
UsenetChildren of my class and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.
The objective case is correct, but "whom" sets a pretty high register nowadays. It's a little jarring after those two highly informal phrases right before it. Also, I'd use "who(m)ever" in this context.

I hate to be a grammar bore, but I can't see any reason to
0
[nq:2]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.[/nq]
[nq:1]The objective case is correct, but "whom" sets a pretty high register nowadays. It's a little jarring after those two highly informal phrases right before it. Also, I'd use "who(m)ever" in this context.[/nq]
Google found a page -
0
[nq:1]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much who they liked. or Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.[/nq]
A useful rule of thumb for guidance is to sort of turn the sentence around and see whether he or him fits:
Children of my class and generation liked whom/him.

It's usually easy enough to see how it needs to b
0
[nq:2]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty ... and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.[/nq]
[nq:1]A useful rule of thumb for guidance is to sort of turn the sentence around and see whether he or ... whom/him. It's usually easy enough to see how it needs to be turned to show what's what (or who's who).[/nq]
Thank you. That's handy.
[nq:1]More fo
0
[nq:1]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much who they liked. or Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.[/nq]
Actually, I'd be tempted to say "whomever." Otherwise whom is preferable to who, although many people who disdain proper English in order to seem more hip might object to this.
I always teach my ESL students the prope
0
[nq:2]Children of my class and generation ran around with pretty ... and generation ran around with pretty much whom they liked.[/nq]
[nq:1]Actually, I'd be tempted to say "whomever." Otherwise whom is preferable to who, although many people who disdain proper English ... the proper use of whom, but it's frustrating when many ESL coursebooks ignore or even advise against making the distinction

Related Questions