0
Diamondrg Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

who-who(m)ever

Which one(s) is / are correct?

1- I’ll take ---- wants to go.

A) who B) whoever



2- Could I speak to ---- is in charge of International Sales please?

A) whoever B) who



3- He wants to know ---- is in charge of the company?

A) who B) whoever



4- You can bring ---- you like to the party.

A) whoever B) whomever C) who



5- . . . sells to ---- has the money to buy . . .

A) whoever B) whomever C) who

6- Send ---- you wish to send.

A) whoever B) whomever C) who



7- Give the invitation to ---- you wish.

A) whomever B) whoever C) who



8- ---- you wish to give the invitation to is welcome to it.

A) Whoever B) Whomever C) Who
  

Top answer

Would you please write your answers first? Thanks!

  • Would you please write your answers first?
  • Thanks!
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
Would you please write your answers first? Thanks! Emotion: smile
0
Choose between whoever or whomever based on its function within the subordinate clause.

The third one is interesting. (It's not a question by the way, so you can drop the question mark.)
Either answer is possible depending what interpretation you give to know! It can mean get to know a person (become familiar with a person) or find out (a fact).
0
thank you, Jim.
DiamondrgWhich one(s) is / are correct?

1- I’ll take ---- wants to go.

A) who B) whoever



2- Could I speak to ---- is in charge of International Sales please?

A) whoever B) who



0
1. OK
2. OK
3. OK - In this context, strictly speaking, no. "who" and "the person who" give a different reading because of the grouping "know the person" which results.
4. OK. "whoever" is correct informally, too. Yes. It is not correct in formal English.
5. OK. "whomever" is not correct, no.
6. OK.
7. OK.
8. "Whomever" is the more formal of the
0


1- I don't know whoever is following me.

2- She wants to know who is following me.

I think "who" in 1 or "whoever" in 2 is not possible, not only because of their semantic properties, but also 2's being an indirect question. Right?
No. Both are "who"; both are indirect questions after "know
0
Thank you, Jim. Why is "whoever" in 1(below), "who" in 2 or "whoever" in 3 not possible? Doesn't "whoever" also mean "the person / people who"? How can we differentiate between especially 2 and 3?

1- I don't know who is following me.

well, would interpreting "I don't know whoever is following me." as "I don't think there is anyone that is following m
0
"Stuck", you say???!!! Why, I never would have guessed! Emotion: smile

This is a tough one, and I'm inclined to say that I, too, am s
0
Thank you Jim for your interest and explanations.

Related Questions