What do you think, victo?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
victo‘Whom’ and ‘whomever’.Yes, those forms would be acceptable because they function as direct objects of the verbs antagonizing and choose, respectively.
victo'Whoever'/'Whomever' you choose for the job will be a true asset to our team.But 'Who(m)ever' is the subject of 'will be..........team.'
canadian45But 'Who(m)ever' is the subject of 'will be..........team.'Not quite. The subject is the noun clause whomever you choose for the job.
Aspara GusNot quite. The subject is the noun clause whomever you choose for the job.no
Aspara GusYes, but again, the pronoun is not functioning as the subject of the main clause It is. That's why the whole question is raised. But in the other sentence in the OP, the pronoun is only functioning as an object so the choice is more straightforward. but rather as the direct object of the verb
canadian45And you want me to believe that being an object in the subordinate clause takes precedence over being the subject in the independent clause.No. A word cannot function as both subject and object.
Aspara GusNo. A word cannot function as both subject and object.You obviously haven’t taken my advice, and I’m not going to repeat myself.
That's not what I said! I said we have to choose one of the pronouns.