0
Anonymous Posted 8 years ago
Grammar

Who was or who were

Hey, I was doing my schoolwork, and I had this question that made me wonder why is the correct answer to the 17. "were looking for" instead of "was looking for"? Or could this be my teacher's mistake

16. “Having a commercial background, I ____ ...

Valitse yksi:a. will writeb. wrotec. write

17. to Jaguar, who ____ someone just at that moment.

Valitse yksi:a. has been looking forb. were looking forc. is looking for
  

Top answer

If "Jaguar" is a company (not a person's name) and you are being taught British English, 'were' is quite possible. Otherwise, as in American English, it's 'was'. The British tend to make subject-verb agreement plural for certain collective nouns, like 'team', 'family', and the names of companies.

  • If "Jaguar" is a company (not a person's name) and you are being taught British English, 'were' is quite possible.
  • Otherwise, as in American English, it's 'was'.
  • The British tend to make subject-verb agreement plural for certain collective nouns, like 'team', 'family', and the names of companies.
  • CJ
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0

If "Jaguar" is a company (not a person's name) and you are being taught British English, 'were' is quite possible. Otherwise, as in American English, it's 'was'.

The British tend to make subject-verb agreement plural for certain collective nouns, like 'team', 'family', and the names of companies.

CJ

Related Questions