Anonymous My reasoning is that 'who supposed it was' could be restructured as 'she supposed it was him', making 'whom' the appropriate word choice as the object of the sentence. Your reasoning is correct in formal English. However, present day English is losing the inflection of "who," which just continues the evolution of our language in losing inflections.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousMy reasoning is that 'who supposed it was' could be restructured as 'she supposed it was him', making 'whom' the appropriate word choice as the object of the sentence.Your reasoning is correct in formal English. However, present day English is losing the inflection of "who," which just continues the evolution of our language in losing inflections. T
AnonymousMy reasoning is that 'who supposed it was' could be restructured as 'she supposed it was him', making 'whom' the appropriate word choice as the object of the sentence.The correct form is who. The pronouns he and who have different rules for case assignment. Whom is possible only when it is an object of a verb
AnonymousMy reasoning is that 'who supposed it was' could be restructured as 'she supposed it was him', making 'whom' the appropriate word choice as the object of the sentence.All that amounts to 'she supposed it was him/whom', but when the 'whom' moves from "after the verb" (was), to "before the verb", it becomes 'who'. Who is it? It is him.