Top answer
anonymous So you are among 105 people who he follows It's a bit ambiguous in that that it's not clear whom he follows: is it "you" (who happened to be among 105 people) or is it "105 people" (including "you")? Anyway, "who", "whom" or zero relative pronoun are possible in the cited sentence. )
- anonymous So you are among 105 people who he follows It's a bit ambiguous in that that it's not clear whom he follows: is it "you" (who happened to be among 105 people) or is it "105 people" (including "you")?
- Anyway, "who", "whom" or zero relative pronoun are possible in the cited sentence.
- )
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
anonymousSo you are among 105 people who he follows
It's a bit ambiguous in that that it's not clear whom he follows: is it "you" (who happened to be among 105 people) or is it "105 people" (including "you")?
Anyway, "who", "whom" or zero relative pronoun are possible in the cited sentence.
(I'm a non-native.)
0"Whom" is technically correct, and "who" is not. However, "whom" in that position has disappeared in everyday use in the United States, and everybody uses "who". In formal English, I think "whom" is still better.
0
Related Questions