0
Anonymous Posted 10 years ago
Grammar
Who or whom?
The primary stucture is:
That was the man who hit his wife.
If I were to expand by adding eye witnesses who saw the incident, which is correct?
1.That was the man who, eye witnesses said, hit his wife.
2. That was the man whom eye witnesses said hit his wife.
That was the man who hit his wife.
If I were to expand by adding eye witnesses who saw the incident, which is correct?
1.That was the man who, eye witnesses said, hit his wife.
2. That was the man whom eye witnesses said hit his wife.
Top answer
Anonymous If I were to expand by adding eye witnesses who saw the incident, which is correct? That was the man who, eyewitnesses said, hit his wife. The insertion of the comment phrase does not affect the grammar.
- Anonymous If I were to expand by adding eye witnesses who saw the incident, which is correct?
- That was the man who, eyewitnesses said, hit his wife.
- The insertion of the comment phrase does not affect the grammar.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
3 Answers
0
AnonymousIf I were to expand by adding eye witnesses who saw the incident, which is correct?1.That was the man who, eyewitnesses said, hit his wife.
The insertion of the comment phrase does not affect the grammar.
00
0
Related Questions