0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

(who) have

Which is correct please?
I've never seen a woman who had X without Y.
I've never seen a woman with X without Y.

Which of these is natural?

1 A Rarely do you see women with artificial nails have all the nails. Most of the time, the women is missing a nail because it's fallen off.

1 B Rarely do you see women with artificial nails who have all the nails. Most of the time, the woman is missing a nail because it's fallen off.

2 A Rarely do you see women with nail polish on have all the fingers nail polish. Most of the time, at least one nail nail polish is chipped.

2 B Rarely do you see women with nail polish on who have all the fingers nail polished. Most of the time, at least one nail is chipped .

3 A Rarely do you see a a boxer that boxes without a mouth piece have all his teeth.

3 B Rarely do you see a a boxer that boxes without a mouth piece who has all his teeth.Thank you very much

Is 'who' optional?

Who is optional is this right? Does it change the meaning?
You can say 'Rarely do you see people do that'
'Rarely do you see people who do that'

Thank you
  

Top answer

I’ve never seen a woman who had X without Y is natural. 1. A.

  • I’ve never seen a woman who had X without Y is natural.
  • 1.
  • A.
  • is grammatically incorrect.
  • 1.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
I’ve never seen a woman who had X without Y is natural.

1. A. is grammatically incorrect.
1. B. is correct but would be better with “all their nails”.

In 2a, the ‘nail polish’ belongs to the fingers, so possession requires an apostrophe after fingers.
In 2b, the nails are ‘polished’, so possession requires an apostrophe after nails (not nail). But 2b is better af

Related Questions