0
MeggPhaggSioux Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Who are

"In this room, there are five who are unemployed and ten underemployed."

Would dropping "who are" cause ungrammaticality?
  

Top answer

I believe you will need the "who are" in both cases: In this room, there are five who are unemployed and ten who are underemployed. " It wouldn't be ungrammatical, but it might not be clear to the listener if you haven't already been talking about this topic. If you are writing, I suggest you use the "who are" before both unemployed and underemployed as I stated above.

  • I believe you will need the "who are" in both cases: In this room, there are five who are unemployed and ten who are underemployed.
  • " It wouldn't be ungrammatical, but it might not be clear to the listener if you haven't already been talking about this topic.
  • If you are writing, I suggest you use the "who are" before both unemployed and underemployed as I stated above.
  • " In this room, there are five people who are unemployed and ten who are underemployed.
  • Chalk American, native English speaker
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
I believe you will need the "who are" in both cases:

In this room, there are five who are unemployed and ten who are underemployed.

If you are in the middle of a conversation and you have already been discussing this topic, you could probably say, "in this room, there are five unemployed and ten underemployed." It wouldn't be ungrammatical, but it might not be clear to the liste
0
In this room, there are five unemployed and ten underemployed.-- This is fine, Megg. No 'who are' is required anywhere in the sentences you have presented.

Related Questions