In English, I often hear something like "......love who you are", or ".......love what you are". Maybe this is more of a comprehending excercise more than anything else, but can someone help me the similiarities and differences of the 2 phrases: "who you are" and "what you are"?
And is there a difference in meaning between:
Our past experiences shape "who/what" we are today.
Thanks in advance
Raen
Top answer
It is a subtle distinction. “Who” refers to a person where “What” refers to things. Take the phrase “What I’ve become is not who I am”.
— Ugan
It is a subtle distinction.
“Who” refers to a person where “What” refers to things.
Take the phrase “What I’ve become is not who I am”.
“What I’ve become” refers to the manifestation of self and “who I am is the subjective self.
I’m sure there are better answers but I thought I’d give this one a try.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
They amount to the same thing. Iago and Popeye: "I am what I am." "Who" is more personal - we're saying, "I am a person!"
I recall John McCain (who was tortured) arguing against the US torture policy. Some in favor of torture were saying, "But these are people who did X, Y, and Z." John replied, "It's not about who they are; it's about who we are."
"Our past experiences shape who we are today." "Our past experiences shape what we are today." As stand-alone sentences, I don't think people would sense any significant difference in meaning between the two. However, the broader context might make the use of 'who' more appropriate than 'what', or vice versa.
So it seems these 2 phrase are used interchangably, because they basically "amount to the same thing", right? I want to make sure there isn't a distinct difference I should pay attention to. Here is a working sentence (that's not new in any sense, by the way),
"......every single past experience contributes to who/what we are today."