0
Milky Posted 19 years ago
Linguistics Studies

Which way would you sway?

0Which would you say is true from the part in blue?02br
02br
00"What status does the traditional notion of SVO clause structure for a language like English have in conversational data? 01font00Are the "ellipted" utterances of conversation really just a reduced and partial form of the "real" grammar? Or are the well-formed texts of written texts elaborated versions of the sparse and economical basic spoken structures elaborated because they have less contextual support in writing and must therefore increase the amount of redundancy00?"02font02br
02br
01i00New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. 02i00By00 Eli Hinkel, Sandra Fotos0-
  

Top answer

01. "02br 02br 002. "02br 02br 00In #1, context provides the missing information.

  • 01.
  • "02br 02br 002.
  • "02br 02br 00In #1, context provides the missing information.
  • In #2, all the information is expressed by the written text.
  • 02br 02br 00MrP0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

11 Answers
0
01. Spoken text: "Do you want me to – ?" Reply: "Yes, please."02br
02br
002. Written text: "Do you want me to do X?" Reply: "Yes, please."02br
02br
00In #1, context provides the missing information. In #2, all the information is expressed by the written text. 02br
02br
00That doesn't mean that #2 contains redundancy: there is no increas
0
0When people first started to study grammar they looked at written texts. This was almost inevitable as those who studied grammar were literate. They looked at the texts of the "masters" and formulated rules accordingly. Any deviations from the rules, and especially those found in speech, were felt to be corrupt in some way.02br
02br
00Then linguists started to study unwritt
0
0<When people first started to study grammar they looked at written texts. This was almost inevitable as those who studied grammar were literate. They looked at the texts of the "masters" and formulated rules accordingly. Any deviations from the rules, and especially those found in speech, were felt to be corrupt in some way.>02br
02br
00And they used Latin as a model,
0
0It seems to me that classical and scholastic grammarians studied Grammar in relation to the study of Rhetoric; and the study of Rhetoric related to effective public speaking. 02br
02br
00I would be interested to see quotations from the early English grammarians that presented spoken English as somehow inferior, or that demonstrated an imposition of inappropriate rules from L
0
0<I would be interested to see quotations from the early English grammarians that presented spoken English as somehow inferior, or that demonstrated an imposition of inappropriate rules from Latin. >02br
02br
00Do you doubt that was the case?02br
02br
00If so, I guess you disagree with this:02br
02br
00"If they have studied "Engli
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Milky12cite10<I would be interested to see quotations from the early English grammarians that presented spoken English as somehow inferior, or that demonstrated an imposition of inappropriate rules from Latin. >12br
12br
10Do you doubt that was the case?12br
12br
12blockquote
0
0 01table01tr01td02tr02table
02br
02br
00[Lowth] condemned "forcing the English under the rules of a foreign Language"01sup01a01font00102font02a02sup00). 02br
02br
02td
01block
0
0 01blockquote
02br
12br
10I'll have to dig it out. I'm sure I had such years ago.12br
12br
12blockquote
10Well, don't go to any trouble. If you've seen examples, fair enough. 02br
02br
00MrP0-
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Milky12cite10And they used Latin as a model, right? 12blockquote
10 I was thinking as much about ancient grammarians as well as not so ancient ones. The point I wanted to make was that they studied written texts, rather than speech.0-
0
0 01blockquote
00Which would you say is true from the part in blue?12blockquote
10The part in blue just has two questions. Can questions be true or false?02br
02br
00 In any case, I'd answer "They might be" for both questions.02br
02br
00 I find them analogous to02br
02br
01i00Is 6 01b

Related Questions