If you are writing in the present, then "was" obviously implies that this was the opinion before the events described. "is" could be justified in the sense that he could be a good husband and father (good to his family) despite his criminal behaviour, or, as, you say, if "everyone" does not yet know about the crime. If you are writing in the past then "is" becomes "was", and "was" becomes "had been".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
tamguatlay tamguatlayMy sentences are part of religious testimony. In that case, should I use "is" or "was"? Thanks.It depends on whether you want to claim that everyone still considers him a good husband and father.
GPYWhy do you disagree with my answer?I don't. That's fine too.
CalifJimI was just thinking, though, that it says "embezzlement of his company's funds", and I couldn't imagine that the people at the company he worked for now think he is so wonderful, so it can't be "everyone".Oh, I see. My thinking was that "everyone's" opinion of him as a husband and father could be different from their opinion of him in respect of his b
GPY... as a husband and father could be different from their opinion of him in respect of his behaviour at work.Theoretically, yes, but human nature is such that opinions tend to bleed over from one area to another, so that to the victims of the embezzlement the guy is most likely a total persona non grata in every respect even if they used t