0
Floral Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

'which' or 'that'

'The only game which I play are pingpong.'
or
'The only game that I play are pingpong.'
  

Top answer

I think you can use both. By the way, don't you have use "is" instead of "are"? or is it correct grammatically with "are"?

  • I think you can use both.
  • By the way, don't you have use "is" instead of "are"?
  • or is it correct grammatically with "are"?
  • I think it's different from "I were/was".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

12 Answers
0
I think you can use both.
By the way, don't you have use "is" instead of "are"?
or is it correct grammatically with "are"?
I think it's different from "I were/was".
0
Hello

I'm afraid it would be a prescriptive rule but I was taught in school as follows:

Choose "that" rather than "which"
in the case the antecedent is modified by
"all", "every", "any", "no", "the only", "the same", "the very"
or any adjective in superlative form (the ....est or the most .....).

So if you have to choose
0
so sorry!
It's 'is' instead of 'are'.A WRONG TYPING.
0
What I've been told is that "that" is the form preferred by purists to introduce restrictive relative clauses (which is the case here). Not that "which" is wrong but some examiners could make a point of it.
0
Miche, I have heard the same thing. I believe you are absolutely right on this point. CJ
0
What I've been told is that "that" is the form preferred by purists to introduce restrictive relative clauses (which is the case here). Not that "which" is wrong but some examiners could make a point of it.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Miche,

ESL students should not have to put up with examiners or teachers who pr
0
demand proof


Can you suggest what form such a proof would take?
0
CJ: Can you suggest what form such a proof would take?

JTT: I think "any" would be a good start, Jim.
0
"any"???

But what would any proof be like? Quotations from grammar books, from journal articles, from forums like this one?
0
"any"???

JTT: Precisely, Jim, any.

Let's not get all philosophical here. Go to those grammar books where this 'rule' is espoused and seek out the proof therein. I think you probably already have and its sparsity has led you on this tack.

CJ: But what would any proof be like? Quotations from grammar books, from journal articles, from forums like this one? Statistic

Related Questions