" is not viable as a sentence by itself. However, this sequence of words can validly appear as part of a longer sentence. " is possible as a sentence.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
mizansinha007Yes, 2nd one is possible. But why? Is 'use' transitive or intransitive verb?In Modern English, the verb "use" is always transitive (if we exclude the past tense structure "X used to + infinitive").
GPYFor interest, there is at least one intransitive sense of "use", meaning to use drugs. So, "He's using" could be a valid sentence. However, 99.9% of the time "use" is transitive.But isn't the object (drugs) implied? I guess technically "use" is still transitive even in this case, but then again, it's hard to be all technical when it comes to informal speec
GPY... I've just been checking various dictionaries, and not many seem to separately list this use. However, Merriam-Webster does actually list it as intransitive: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/useThen I stand corrected as to the wording of my first post in
ozzourtiThen I stand corrected as to the wording of my first post in this thread. They say "never say never", but from now on I say "never say always".I think what you said was correct for all practical purposes for the OP. I only mentioned it as a curiosity really.