0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Which makes it difficult to?

Dear teachers, hello.

I am trying to understand what the 'it' below is about. It can be found in many academic texts.

". . . which makes it difficult to . . ."

I was searching within a grammar book. It is not a dummy it, right? Is it "clefting"? "Extraposed to-clauses"?

I write things like "It is difficult to think about life," but did not know about this kind of construction.

Thank you!!!
  

Top answer

Anonymous It is not a dummy it, right? It is a dummy pronoun, filling the direct object position for the extraposed ‘ to -clause’. This is because such clauses don’t (at least not normally) function as object.

  • Anonymous It is not a dummy it, right?
  • It is a dummy pronoun, filling the direct object position for the extraposed ‘ to -clause’.
  • This is because such clauses don’t (at least not normally) function as object.
  • Thus we couldn’t say * which makes to walk difficult.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
AnonymousIt is not a dummy it, right?
It is a dummy pronoun, filling the direct object position for the extraposed ‘to-clause’. This is because such clauses don’t (at least not normally) function as object. Thus we couldn’t say *which makes to walk difficult.
0
Thank you. But I still do not understand.

So it is obligatory, right? I cannot say "I am always feeling tired, which makes difficult to get a good job," but need to say "I am always feeling tired, which makes it difficult to get a good job", right?

But why? Which clauses do not work as object?

And we can say the same about other adjectives like "easy", "important", and s
0
AnonymousSo it is obligatory, right? I cannot say "I am always feeling tired, which makes difficult to get a good job," but need to say "I am always feeling tired, which makes it difficult to get a good job", right?
Yes; dummy it is an integral part of extraposition. You can’t just move the clause to the end of the sentence and leave the object position
0
Hello. Thank you again. For now, I understand the rule but am not sure yet about the logic behind it. I have looked for cases like those in my grammar books (I have three), but all I have found is simpler instances.

Do you know some extra material covering this subject?

Thank you again.
0
Anonymous not sure yet about the logic behind it.
That’s because there is none. It’s just the way it is.
AnonymousDo you know some extra material covering this subject?
Yes: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. If you register I’ll PM you the relevant pages (or you may be able to find them online yourself).

Related Questions