0
Talab1234 Posted 4 years ago
Grammar
Which is why
Joe already sent the payments to Bob which is why there was no need to send it to Bob again.
Is this grammatically correct?
Top answer
talab1234 Joe (had) already sent the payments to Bob , which is why there was no need to send it to Bob /him again. Correct. 'had' is optional, but it makes your sentence a little more polished.
- talab1234 Joe (had) already sent the payments to Bob , which is why there was no need to send it to Bob /him again.
- Correct.
- 'had' is optional, but it makes your sentence a little more polished.
- At the end it might sound better to write "send it to him again" instead of repeating "Bob".
- Don't forget the comma before a non-defining relative clause.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
talab1234Joe (had) already sent the payments to Bob, which is why there was no need to send it to Bob/him again.
Correct. 'had' is optional, but it makes your sentence
0
Related Questions