Which is correct

" There has been a reported death case from a meteorite strike in India. But NASA has yet to confirm whether the culprit was a meteoritei claiming that the odds of it being caused by a land-based explosion are higher. If NASA scientists do confirm that a meteorite - not space junk or other space debris - led to the incident, this would be the first scientifically proven meteorite fatality. There have been reports of injuries before, but even those were very rare since space rocks usually burn up when passing through the atmosphere or land in the ocean or hit remote areas. Hence, astronomers put the lifetime odds of dying from a meteoritei asteroid or comet impact at 1 in 1,600,000 compared with 1 in 90 for a car accident and 1 in 135,000 for a lightning strike. It is true that 65 million years ago, a meteorite wiped out millions of organisms, even whole species but they were all killed from the aftereffects like heat, radiation and dust."

1- Which of the following ideas is not implied in the passage?

A- The rarity of meteorite injuries does not necessarily mean that meteorite deaths are rare, too.

B- The odds of a lighting strike killing a person are much higher than those of a meteorite strike.

C- Most of the meteorites that hit the Earth land in inaccessible or unpopulated places.

D- The meteorite that hit the Earth 65 million years ago did not directly kill all organisms as it landed.

E- Some meteorites are completely destroyed in the atmosphere before reaching the Earth.

I said A. Is it correct?